Independent intelligence for software built with AIResearch edition / 19 Sep 2026
SHIP/PROOFAI CODE FIELD GUIDE

The decision workbench

Put the tradeoff
on the table.

Three local tools for planning an AI-assisted change. No uploads, account connection, vendor scoring or automated release decisions.

01 / Planning estimate

Count accepted changes.
Count the review.

Read the method ↗

Compare two hypothetical batches of the same task type. Include time for rejected attempts. A change counts as accepted only after your review criteria are met. The defaults are illustrative inputs, not measured outcomes.

Your batch assumptions

Enter your assumptions and calculate. No result is a forecast.

Formula, assumptions and what this excludes

Baseline cost = tasks × (implementation + review) ÷ 60 × hourly cost. Assisted cost = tasks × (implementation + review + rework) ÷ 60 × hourly cost + tool cost. Cost per accepted change = batch cost ÷ accepted changes. Net saving = baseline batch cost − assisted batch cost.

Both batches use the same attempted-task count and labor rate. Baseline implementation must include baseline rework; AI rework is separate. Include total human-attended minutes, not background machine time, in labor inputs. Tool cost can include subscriptions allocated to the batch, model usage and execution fees. Currency is user-defined; no exchange rates or current vendor prices are supplied.

Task mix, variance, long-term maintenance, incidents, opportunity cost and quality beyond your acceptance rule are excluded. Different accepted counts make total batch savings misleading; compare cost per accepted change and investigate the rejected work. This is planning arithmetic, not evidence of causal productivity gains.

02 / Qualitative comparison

Where does the
work belong?

Read the guide ↗

Choose the strongest constraint. This compares workflow classes, not named vendors. Recommendations are editorial starting points; configured permissions and deployment details can change the answer.

Work-surface tradeoffs — editorial framework, not a product benchmark
SurfaceUseful whenInspect firstHandoff evidence
EditorYou steer and review while working.Extension, context and command access.Diff + focused tests + manual checks.
TerminalCommands and repository artifacts define the task.Shell authority, working directory and secrets.Reproducible commands + outputs + patch.
Remote workerThe assignment can run separately and return for review.Credentials, network, environment and data retention.Pinned environment + logs + reviewable branch.
Graph runtimePersistent state and side-effect ordering dominate.Replay, duplicate delivery and approval semantics.State transitions + failure matrix + reconciliation.

Local execution is not automatically private: model endpoints, telemetry, connectors and credentials still matter. Read the local-model guide.

03 / Session-only checklist

What goes with
the patch?

Read the contract ↗

Check the artifacts you can actually produce. This is a handoff aid, not an audit, risk score or release approval. State stays in this tab and resets on reload.

0 of 8 evidence items marked. Completion is not approval.